Solutions for Drilling Managers
When Every Rig
Reflects on You
Managing Performance Across Multiple Rigs
As a drilling manager, your responsibility isn't one well.
It's multiple rigs, multiple supervisors, multiple cost profiles - all moving at once.
You're expected to know:
Which wells are trending below plan
Which supervisors consistently deliver strong execution
Where cost accuracy is tightening - or slipping
Where recurring operational inefficiencies are forming
But in most operations, that visibility lives in separate places - daily reports, spreadsheets, memory, conversations.
Performance insights are fragmented.
EIM's Competency Report consolidates these layers into a single structured view. It pulls validated operational data, efficiency metrics (planned vs actual m/day), cost accuracy (AFE vs final), and recorded safety outcomes into one standardized supervisor profile.
Instead of piecing together insight from different systems, you open one page and see measurable execution history.
You don't chase information. It's structured for you.
Moving From Reputation to Measured Performance
Every manager knows their supervisors by reputation.
But reputation doesn't always reflect full portfolio data.
When performance is structured consistently per well and aggregated across time, patterns become visible:
Who consistently exceeds planned m/day
Who delivers closer-to-AFE outcomes
Who maintains strong safety consistency across complex pads
The Competency Report scores supervisors on a standardized 1–9 scale across safety, efficiency, and accuracy - per well and across their portfolio.
Managing Execution While It's Happening
Performance rarely collapses suddenly. It drifts.
Meters per day trending slightly below plan. Minor cost overages accumulating. Repeated small inefficiencies across shifts.
Without live context, these signals hide in daily summaries.
EIM connects validated field data to structured P90/P75/P50 drilling curves - statistical percentile benchmarks derived from comparable offset wells in the region. These curves represent best case (P90), expected (P75), and base case (P50) performance targets. Actual performance is continuously measured against each benchmark.
Which wells are drifting
Which supervisors are outperforming plan
Where execution needs correction
Not after TD. While drilling.
P90/P75/P50 benchmarking transforms post-well review into real-time performance management.
Connecting Wells to People
The real leverage comes from linking P90/P75/P50 performance directly into Competency scoring.
Efficiency scores are not subjective. They reflect actual vs planned performance.
Accuracy scores are not assumptions. They reflect AFE vs final outcomes.
Safety scoring is structured across recorded data.
Each well strengthens the supervisor's execution portfolio. Each program builds measurable history.
When assigning the next pad, you are not guessing fit. You are deploying based on structured performance data.
High performers are intentionally matched to complex wells
Training needs are visible early
Organizational averages improve
Confidence in the Numbers Behind the Decisions
All performance management depends on reliable data.
Field entries contain human errors. Numbers are mistyped. Costs are miscategorized.
If performance scoring or P90/P75/P50 curves are built on flawed inputs, intervention decisions lose accuracy.
Continuous data validation ensures that operational data is reviewed during entry, calculation, and reporting. Unusual values are flagged before they distort analytics. Corrections are logged. Every report carries an audit trail.
Competency scoring and P90/P75/P50 tracking are built on validated data - not unchecked spreadsheets.
That integrity allows you to stand behind performance conversations with confidence.
With Competency and P90/P75/P50 Integrated
You are no longer reacting to fragmented reports.
You are managing structured performance.